olde_fashioned (
olde_fashioned) wrote2007-07-24 10:04 pm
Entry tags:
Harry Potter: for those of you who are interested...
For the record, I am utterly opposed to Harry Potter and other books involving and glorifying witchcraft. THIS is a link to Doug Phillips' blog, that explains the dangers of Harry Potter much better than I ever could.
no subject
no subject
Didn't read the article...but, you know...even disregarding the magic, there's some major moral problems. Harry, as all these kids' role-model, is a very, very bad boy. And gets *away* with it all the time. I just think it's beyond frustrating that people like him so much.
It's sort of like all the girls that say they'd love to marry Erik, the Phantom of the Opera.
Why don't we just go out and TRY to get ourselves in oodles of trouble!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And when the obvious comes, we act all surprised about it.
People are very bad about not watching for spiritual attacks. And the demons are being maddeningly good right now about making all the world fight about this issue and ignore the things that really come in and wedge problems.
It's amazing how it works.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
And you're exactly right.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Although I am not a Christian I do know that the Church of England quite supports the series. Rowling herself is a Christian though may take a more liberal stand than you or Mr. Phillips.
There certainly have been Christians who have practiced magic. I am sure many wise women and cunning men who practiced folk magic in times past considered themselves Christian.
no subject
Many Christians unfortunately support that which the Bible condemns. Thousands of churches have openly gay bishops and pastors, yet God is clearly against that kind of behaviour. Proverbs 14:12 warns us "There is a way which seemeth right to a man, but the end of it are the ways of death" and not to lean on our own understanding. We are imperfect beings with imperfect minds, and to even think that we know better than God is ridiculous, not to mention dangerous.
If Rowling is a Christian then she is clearly a misguided one. The Bible says it would better for one who leads little ones astray to be drowned with a millstone around their neck, and Heaven only knows how many children have been forever ensnared by Rowling's books.
Christians practicing magic is mutually exclusive. You might as well say you're a Muslim Catholic. The two don't mix. Each condemns the other, and God doesn't allow straddling both sides of the fence. We are either for Him, or against Him. There is no middle ground.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Although, it almost bothers me more when people who condemn Harry Potter fully support things like LOTR and Chronicles of Narnia, things that seem to have just as much wizardry and magic in them. I guess it makes me all the more thankful for those Christians who choose to keep themselves "unspotted from the world". :)
no subject
C.S. Lewis is considered one of the great writers on Christianity (at least in England) and the Inklings, the group were originally called the 'Oxford Christians'.
You may wish to distance yourself from all references in art and literature to magic but my local quite conservative Christian bookshop has no problems selling these books. Not sure if they are so keen on Harry Potter.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'd like to know why witchcraft packaged behind a "Christian allegory" label makes it okay. There is no difference IMVHO.
And witchcraft is exactly where in these books?
Re: And witchcraft is exactly where in these books?
Re: And witchcraft is exactly where in these books?
Re: And witchcraft is exactly where in these books?
Re: And witchcraft is exactly where in these books?
Re: And witchcraft is exactly where in these books?
no subject
no subject
I'm going to jump in here. I feel that olde_fashioned has been quite courageous in expressing exactly why she is against the Potter books. I am sure she was aware it would be a controversial stand with some of her readers.
She is very clear in her userinfo about her religious beliefs and this was something I knew before I friended her icon journal. While our spiritual backgrounds and points of view on topics such as this may differ, we still share a love of many things.
(no subject)
no subject
It's one thing to say, "I personally choose not to read Harry Potter because to me, this equates to real witchcraft, and therefore I want nothing to do with it." But we step over the line when we say, "Because I think the Potter books equate to real world witchcraft, I insist that everyone else adopt my interpretation”even though the author has made clear that she did not mean it as real-world witchcraft." They take the view that the Potter books are promoting real occultism to everyone who reads them.
It's taken from a 2001 interview here (http://www.breakpoint.org/listingarticle.asp?ID=5659).
You might want to visit Connie Neal's website (http://www.connieneal.com/index.html) as she does seem to be very aware of the issues and concerns about the books.
no subject
Using this reply, but I'm really here to comment on a few things that you've said.
First of all, I really love how you are so respectful in your disagreements and I already have a great liking for you as a person. Secondly, I absolutely love debates/arguments so I really appreciate your perspective. Thirdly though, this is for you olde-fashioned, my apologies in advance if you'd really rather us not talk. Let me know, and I'll shut my laptop on the discussion. :)
You're getting into some pretty deep things here, and neither will I say that I'm the best person to state my view with good wrapping or even enough, but if you'll bear with me, I'll try.
First off... You mentioned something about only taking Jesus' teachings from the Bible. Well, you can't do that without taking the Bible as a whole, because Jesus TAUGHT from the Old Testament. He used it to hold many of his words to be truth, and he was a Jew. So he followed it. Despite not having all the discussions penned down for us in the gospels, there are quite a few incidents were Jesus is found expounding on the scriptures. After his death, he had a long talk with his disciples in which he expounded ALL of the scriptures to them. Also, Jesus IS the Word. To say that you're going to follow Jesus' teachings is to say you're following the Bible. The Bible isn't simply an inspiration. It is the word of God.
Secondly, both you and another commenter made the statement that we should judge others and the Bible says we shouldn't. ACTUALLY, the Bible says we SHOULD. It says we should never try condemning anyone, because we can't possibly judge another person's soul, but we are supposed to try the spirits, and we are supposed to help each other out in the spiritual battle. I know people try to use the scripture that says we shouldn't be taking specks out of people's eyes when we have motes in our own..But people STOP there. It actually goes on to say that we need to get the mote out of our eye FIRST so we can see clearly to get the speck out of our brother's eye. So there is a judgment there, but also a warning that we need to be sure we're right with God ourselves.
To say that we shouldn't "impose our views" on other people would be directly against God's commandments. We should educate people in what is right and wrong.
But, you know, it's kind of hard to get the unsaved sinner to follow God's principles. That's one thing that we do that Jesus never ever did. On the other hand, I don't think it's a bad thing in the least to let the world know where we stand. And it's not a bad thing to try to get other Christians to try to search out the scriptures and find God's will for issues.
And if Connie Neal or anyone else can prove to me that my view of the scriptures is wrong, and that God's will is really such and such, then I'd gladly follow that other view. But I don't believe that's the case, and I will stick by God and His Word and keep searching out to understand myself in the meantime.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Finally getting back to you.
no subject
I looked into Connie Neal and the links you gave me, and thank you, they were interesting.
I don't know if I'm being unclear or not, but by stating my beliefs of Harry Potter, LotR, and Narnia, I am not demanding everyone else adopt my views. I'm merely stating them, the same way as I might state certain costume dramas are my favourite or that I can't stand certain types of music. I'm not saying that I know all, or even that I know better, so please don't think that. If I am coming off in a manner such as I have described then please forgive me. The last thing in the world that I want to do is tell other people how to think!
Also, Connie Neal seems to stand upon the arguement that Harry Potter is okay because LotR and Narnia depict similar elements, and that if we're going to condemn HP we'd have to chuck Lewis and Tolkien out the window, too. I haven't read anything so far other than those comparisons and the "it's harmless and pretend" argument to convince me of her POV.
On a side note, her books seem to be published by Zondervan, who is also the publisher that came out with the "gender-neutral" Bible which removed all references that suggested God was male.
(no subject)
no subject
I agree with you...oh yes and Raul is certainly better than the evil Phantom, no matter how tortured he is. *grin*
http://decentfilms.com/sections/articles/magic.html
That, (I'm not catholic) also was a very good article I thought. Balanced, and perhaps more approchable for those who are already into HP.
Interesting stuff. :)
no subject
Thanks for the link -- I'll finish reading it when I have a little more time. But what I did read was interesting.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Anyhow, my older sister has the opinion (which I sort of agree with) that you can't have a valid argument/opinion if you haven't personally read the book to see what you think. A while ago I almost took her up on it, but now I just have no desire to really get in the problem at all. But it is a good idea to act on if you want to pursue it.
Anyhow (again), I'm just hoping it's a fad and will die off now.
no subject
If your brother is in need of reading material, I would strongly suggest you look into G.A. Henty books for him. VisionForum.com sells them, and they're wonderful. I simply cannot praise them enough, and aside from the adventure you get a lot of history, too. ;-)
I disagree with you sister. There are plenty of movies I avoid because of the subject matter, ratings, etc.
Ditto on that score!
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Again this is just my personal opinion...I hope I don't seem like I'm bashing or whatever.
no subject