Harry Potter: for those of you who are interested...

[olde_fashioned]

For the record, I am utterly opposed to Harry Potter and other books involving and glorifying witchcraft. THIS is a link to Doug Phillips' blog, that explains the dangers of Harry Potter much better than I ever could.

Comments

Finally getting back to you.

[musesong.livejournal.com]

First off... You mentioned something about only taking Jesus' teachings from the Bible. Well, you can't do that without taking the Bible as a whole, because Jesus TAUGHT from the Old Testament. He used it to hold many of his words to be truth, and he was a Jew. So he followed it. Despite not having all the discussions penned down for us in the gospels, there are quite a few incidents were Jesus is found expounding on the scriptures. After his death, he had a long talk with his disciples in which he expounded ALL of the scriptures to them. Also, Jesus IS the Word. To say that you're going to follow Jesus' teachings is to say you're following the Bible. The Bible isn't simply an inspiration. It is the word of God.

I certainly agree with you about needing to take the whole of the Bible into account though there are passages about things like the owning of slaves and certain rights of women that people do not follow from the OT.

As for the Bible being the Word of God, I know this is a central tenet for some Christians but it is one that I could never subscribe to given the many times it has been translated (and likely mistranslated), the way certain books were cut from inclusion as well as other historical considerations - such as the Gospels being written decades after Jesus' death. Indeed one of the reasons some books were left out of the Bible was because they were deemed not to be 'inspired enough'.

I guess it is quite a thorny theological debate as to whether something inspired equates to being a direct transmission so s never to be question.

Followers of the Koran also believe it to be the Word of God and the same God as in the Old Testament.

Secondly, both you and another commenter made the statement that we should judge others and the Bible says we shouldn't. ACTUALLY, the Bible says we SHOULD. It says we should never try condemning anyone, because we can't possibly judge another person's soul, but we are supposed to try the spirits, and we are supposed to help each other out in the spiritual battle. I know people try to use the scripture that says we shouldn't be taking specks out of people's eyes when we have motes in our own..But people STOP there. It actually goes on to say that we need to get the mote out of our eye FIRST so we can see clearly to get the speck out of our brother's eye. So there is a judgment there, but also a warning that we need to be sure we're right with God ourselves.

Did I say that? Can you point me to the comment because this sounds a bit ooc for me.

To say that we shouldn't "impose our views" on other people would be directly against God's commandments. We should educate people in what is right and wrong.

I do understand this. I am glad that forced conversion to Christianity is a thing of the past.

But, you know, it's kind of hard to get the unsaved sinner to follow God's principles. That's one thing that we do that Jesus never ever did. On the other hand, I don't think it's a bad thing in the least to let the world know where we stand. And it's not a bad thing to try to get other Christians to try to search out the scriptures and find God's will for issues.

I would imagine it is almost impossible if the person does not consider themselves a sinner or in need of salvation. However, speaking up about what you believe in as well as dialoguing with other Christians seems a positive thing to do.

And if Connie Neal or anyone else can prove to me that my view of the scriptures is wrong, and that God's will is really such and such, then I'd gladly follow that other view. But I don't believe that's the case, and I will stick by God and His Word and keep searching out to understand myself in the meantime.

I do feel that writers such as Neal's job isn't to convince that someone is wrong but perhaps to raise questions. I actually hate the idea of people trying to convince other people that what they believe is wrong. I really dislike Richard Dawkins for his militant atheism and disrespect for all religions, though I expect I should be more tolerant.

I do think it is always important to seek out answers for yourself. It is not always a comfortable process.