Liberty and Justice for "all"?
Jun. 14th, 2008 10:09 pmTaken from
ceallaighgirl.
I'm dipping my toes in the waters of political blogging, something that I rarely do. I'm stating right up front that I am screening all comments to this thread in anticipation of the nasty comments that I will most likely get because of this. If you want to comment and discuss things rationally like an adult, then that's fine, even if we disagree. If you're coming here to start a fire and blast myself/other commenters, then don't bother.
And those of you who are offended by this, go ahead and unfriend me. It wouldn't be the first time...;-)
According to Barack Obama, once you are born, you are not a person. If you are unwanted and wished dead, it's okay to kill you, because nobody wants you, anyway, and that means you're not a person! Since when does the government (or anyone, for that matter) get to decide which human being is a person and which is not? The next thing you know, people who are born into poverty won't be human beings, either, or those of us who have physical disabilities, or deformities. With this line of thinking, it's okay to kill someone if they are unwanted or deemed a burden. Terri Schiavo, anyone?
Quoted from this article here,
According to Barack Obama, Gianna Jessen shouldn't exist.
Miss Jessen is an exquisite example of what antiabortion advocates call a "survivor." Well into her third trimester of pregnancy, Gianna's biological mother was injected with a saline solution intended to induce a chemical abortion at a Los Angeles County abortion center. Eighteen hours later, and precious minutes before the abortionist's arrival, Gianna emerged. Premature and with severe injuries that resulted in cerebral palsy. But alive.
Had the abortionist been present at her birth, Gianna would have been killed, perhaps by suffocation. As it was, a startled nurse called an ambulance, and Gianna was rushed to a nearby hospital, where, weighing just two pounds, she was placed in an incubator, then, months later, in foster care.
Gianna survived then, and thrives now, because, as she told me recently with a laugh, "I guess I don't die easy."
Those statements are seriously made but, alas, cannot be taken at all seriously. Mr. Obama has compiled a 100% lifetime "pro-choice" voting record, including votes against any and all restrictions on late-term abortions and parental involvement in teenagers' abortions.
[Obama] promises, "the first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act," which would overturn hundreds of federal and state laws limiting abortion, including the federal ban on partial-birth abortion and bans on public funding of abortion.
This is just wonderful. Not only are unborn babies denied rights, but now an already-born, outside-of-the-womb infant are also "not a person." I pray God that anyone who is so morally bankrupt will never be at the healm of our nation, and hold the fates of ourselves and our children in his bloody hands.
I'm dipping my toes in the waters of political blogging, something that I rarely do. I'm stating right up front that I am screening all comments to this thread in anticipation of the nasty comments that I will most likely get because of this. If you want to comment and discuss things rationally like an adult, then that's fine, even if we disagree. If you're coming here to start a fire and blast myself/other commenters, then don't bother.
And those of you who are offended by this, go ahead and unfriend me. It wouldn't be the first time...;-)
According to Barack Obama, once you are born, you are not a person. If you are unwanted and wished dead, it's okay to kill you, because nobody wants you, anyway, and that means you're not a person! Since when does the government (or anyone, for that matter) get to decide which human being is a person and which is not? The next thing you know, people who are born into poverty won't be human beings, either, or those of us who have physical disabilities, or deformities. With this line of thinking, it's okay to kill someone if they are unwanted or deemed a burden. Terri Schiavo, anyone?
Quoted from this article here,
According to Barack Obama, Gianna Jessen shouldn't exist.
Miss Jessen is an exquisite example of what antiabortion advocates call a "survivor." Well into her third trimester of pregnancy, Gianna's biological mother was injected with a saline solution intended to induce a chemical abortion at a Los Angeles County abortion center. Eighteen hours later, and precious minutes before the abortionist's arrival, Gianna emerged. Premature and with severe injuries that resulted in cerebral palsy. But alive.
Had the abortionist been present at her birth, Gianna would have been killed, perhaps by suffocation. As it was, a startled nurse called an ambulance, and Gianna was rushed to a nearby hospital, where, weighing just two pounds, she was placed in an incubator, then, months later, in foster care.
Gianna survived then, and thrives now, because, as she told me recently with a laugh, "I guess I don't die easy."
Those statements are seriously made but, alas, cannot be taken at all seriously. Mr. Obama has compiled a 100% lifetime "pro-choice" voting record, including votes against any and all restrictions on late-term abortions and parental involvement in teenagers' abortions.
[Obama] promises, "the first thing I'd do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act," which would overturn hundreds of federal and state laws limiting abortion, including the federal ban on partial-birth abortion and bans on public funding of abortion.
This is just wonderful. Not only are unborn babies denied rights, but now an already-born, outside-of-the-womb infant are also "not a person." I pray God that anyone who is so morally bankrupt will never be at the healm of our nation, and hold the fates of ourselves and our children in his bloody hands.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 05:43 am (UTC)This is murder. And the people...specifically those who would vote him into the Presidency, ought to know of it.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:34 am (UTC)Welcome to my journal, then, "officially". ;-D I too, have always abhorred the idea of Obama becoming president but I did not know he had such a disgusting opinion of babies and human life in general. You won't be hearing this anytime soon from the liberal wacko media, that's for sure.
I think our culture has chosen to delete the word ABSTINANCE from its vocabulary. And the idea that children are a "burden" is just downright disgusting. A lot of Europe feels this way, and the birth rate of certain countries is significantly lower than their death rate, which means they'll die out in a few generations if they keep their present course.
Imagine if Obama's mother had regarded him as an "unwanted burden." Hmmm, I wonder if he's ever thought about how lucky he is that his mother chose not to excercise her "right"?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:47 pm (UTC)Great icon!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 06:12 am (UTC)Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
It's so refreshing to find someone who agrees with me on subjects of polotics. It's very rare to find some one who puts out their political opinion like an adult. I only know a few people like this, and even fewer who agree with me.
Exactly, who is Obama, or any pro-abortion person, to dictate who is a person. With this it'll only snowball like you said.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:41 am (UTC)I too, get tired, and sad, and almost apathetic at times. But then I remember that that's what they want, and the last thing I want is to give in to the likes of baby killers. (plus I have a lot of Scottish and Irish blood in me -- perhaps that's where I get my temper!! lol)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 06:46 am (UTC)I'm completely against abortion. I don't care how you got pregenant (in that sense, I do have compassion and empathy for those that go through things like rape etc...) but there are always other options, adoption, foster care, plus some of us believe in a wonderful God who creates every single unborn child (that includes you and me) for a destiny and a purpose in Him.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:24 pm (UTC)That's a touchy issue, but why should the child be punished more harshly for it's father's crime than most hard-core murderers in prison are treated? I believe that is what adoption is for.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:43 am (UTC)LORD HAVE MERCY
Date: 2008-06-15 09:39 am (UTC)I am terrified that Mr. Obama will become the next President of the United States.
You are brave indeed.
I posted something very similar in my journal not long ago and many people called me a racist. How dare they!
It has nothing to do with race.
I want a world where my children will grow up to believe all life is sacred.
Mr. Obama is so far left he truly scares me.
What is happening to our world?
God have mercy on us.
God bless you for being this brave.
Kimmy
Re: LORD HAVE MERCY
Date: 2008-06-15 09:26 pm (UTC)Re: LORD HAVE MERCY
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 01:15 pm (UTC)Could you please post the link from where you got this article? I'd like to share it with some other pro-life people I know.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 02:01 pm (UTC)I know Obama is pro-choice, and it's one of the things I like most about him. (I am happy to calmly discuss why I find that position to be both morally and ethically defensible if you like) However, tis article seems, from all the evidence, to be largely inflammatory, crafted to rouse a sense of emotional outrage in the political arena, rather than inform. I think it is always advisable to take op-ed articles like this with a healthy dose of skepticism.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 04:08 pm (UTC)As my dad says: "God help us."
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 05:08 pm (UTC)Yay for you to bring this to the attention of others because I never knew about it.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:30 pm (UTC)And I never knew about it, either, but I can't say as I'm surprised.
(GORGEOUS icon btw!!)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 05:28 pm (UTC)We can prevent this, though. If conservatives turned up to vote for McCain, even though he isn't ideal, we could beat Obama.
If we don't, he'll pass this law and it will be a long, long, long time (if ever) before we can reverse it, and we will never be able to make up for the lost lives.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:32 pm (UTC)I know. Only I cannot help but wonder, what McCain will do once he's in office? Granted, he's LIGHTYEARS better than either Hillary or Obama, and I suppose we do not have much of a choice, but we as the Christian right will have empowered him (and will thus be responsable) if he does something unBiblical. I'm not sure I want that on my conscience, but neither do I want Obama in our history books and on our money.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 07:33 pm (UTC)where did you get your layout?? it's fantastic.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-16 03:01 am (UTC)I have to say that I agree with pretty much every statement
I'm a pro-choice feminist, which seemingly has become a bad word of late since most young women don't know anything about feminism and believe that women have very few problems. Anyway, I digress. As a feminist I believe in a womans inherent right to choose what goes on with her own body. Feminism isn't only about the choice to have an abortion, it is also about the right to choose not to have one.
While I agree that abstinence is the best choice (which I currently practice it as well), it is unrealistic to believe that the masses will stop having sex and prevent unwanted pregnancies. While abortion may not be the best choice, I believe it is a woman's choice.
Hope I don't get flamed lol! Just expressing my opinion and I don't mean to offend anyone and I'm sorry if I have.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-16 03:17 am (UTC)Do you mean women in civilized, western nations, or women in third-world countries and the Middle East?
I agree that it is unrealistic to expect the masses to practice abstinence, but we could say the same about drug use. People are going to do it, anyway, so let's make it easier for them and pass laws to that effect.
I'm not going to flame you! And I hope no one else does, lol. ;-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-16 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-16 03:13 am (UTC)Yay Nathan!! You have an icon!! ;-D (and mine is pink, especially for you) ;-P
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-16 04:10 am (UTC)I cannot stand Obama, he will certainly not be getting my vote.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-16 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-17 05:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 03:25 pm (UTC)Now where'd I put that voter registration form...
no subject
Date: 2008-06-26 05:02 pm (UTC)Ha!! ;-D
no subject
Date: 2008-06-27 03:40 am (UTC)I stumbled across your lj from a community where you posted a link to your lovely icons. I've never commented here before which is why I felt the need for this little introduction so I won't be some completely random person (lol).
After reading this entry I felt really compelled to ask you a question. Before that though, I'd like to say that I consider myself pro-choice even though I am a Roman Catholic. Reading accounts like the one you posted in this entry always get to me because I feel abortion is such a horrible thing. I don't care how small it is, to me, at least, it's still a life. That's what I believe and I feel in my heart that abortion is murder.
This being said, I am still pro-choice. And I guess this is where I ask my question, as a pro-lifer, ultimately a ban on abortion is your goal, but as a believer in God wouldn't that be making the decision for a woman to keep their baby and thus take away an opportunity for the woman to either do good or bad by the Lord? Of course not having an abortion would be what we hope for, but by not giving her the option, we have taken away her ability to either pass or fail one of lifes many tests. If she chooses to have an abortion, she will be judged by the Lord in the way he sees fit, but by stepping in and telling her what she can or in this case cannot do, it is almost like interfering.
That being said (trying not to turn this into a novel ;), I am definitely not trying to start anything on your journal, just looking for an opinion. Thank you for your time!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-27 04:00 am (UTC)I appreciate your taking the time and consideration to "introduce" yourself, so thank you for that. :-)
I hope I can answer your question and explain myself tolerably well, so here goes:
The point that you raised about leaving the decision to take a child's life up to the woman could be extended into allowing another human being to decide which persons are fit to live and which are not, such as ending the life of a terminally ill patient, or executing retarded people because they are a "burden" to society or their parents. Murder is murder, and murder is wrong. While I agree with you that we have free will and make our own choices, I do not think our society should leave a heinous act (such as murder) unpunished. Laws are there to protect those who cannot protect themselves, and no group needs this protection more than the unborn and helpless. Even a wild animal has at least some means of defending itself against an attacker, and yet we heap more rights upon a cat, a dog, or a seagull than we do on our own race and our own children.
Yes, God will judge us all in the end for our sins, but does that mean we ought to get off "scott free" during this life? I do not think we should. It is more than just a woman's choice about her own body, it is deciding what constitutes the basic right we have to breathe and walk on this earth.
There is a Latin saying that goes, Qui tacet consentit. (he who is silent agrees.) If we are silent, and allow women to murder their children, then we are just as guilty as they are. "Evil triumphs when good men do nothing." If you were standing next to a friend, and a person walked up and was about to kill them, would you stand idly by and allow it to happen? I doubt that you, I, or anyone else would. We would try to stop it, and we should try to stop abortion in all forms. (And also, if abortion is acceptable, then wouldn't that mean that killing your two-year-old is okay, too? That would mean that the likes of Andrea Yates would go unpunished.)
I likewise hope that this is not too long, lol, and that I have answered your question in some way! I am happy to continue this discussion with someone as polite and mannerly as you have been, if I have been unclear in anyway. :-)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-10-13 10:12 pm (UTC)I can't believe he would support that! It saddens and disgusts me that innocent children are dying this horrific deaths. =( God bless them<3
no subject
Date: 2008-10-14 09:15 pm (UTC)I can't believe any human being would support something like that. It is pretty sad, isn't it?