icons: Cranford and Return to Cranford
Jul. 17th, 2010 10:09 pmHere is the final batch of Cranford, and my first attempt at making icons of Return to Cranford, all from promotional stills.
While of course most everyone and their mother (no joke!) loved Cranford, some disliked the sequel. I however found it to be an excellent follow-up that included some of Gaskell's original scenes that the first lacked (the humorous situations surrounding the "cage", for instance!), and the new editions were well done.
(Did anyone else notice Margaret's "train station dress" from N&S on the character of Erminia in several scenes?) ;-D Squee!
As always, never alter my graphics, comment, credit, and enjoy!
Teasers:
Please, if you take anything, be so kind as to take note of the numbers of the icon(s) you're saving, since I am always experimenting with my styles and I would like to know what people like best. (This helps me so I can make more!) The numbers are above the icons.
While of course most everyone and their mother (no joke!) loved Cranford, some disliked the sequel. I however found it to be an excellent follow-up that included some of Gaskell's original scenes that the first lacked (the humorous situations surrounding the "cage", for instance!), and the new editions were well done.
(Did anyone else notice Margaret's "train station dress" from N&S on the character of Erminia in several scenes?) ;-D Squee!
As always, never alter my graphics, comment, credit, and enjoy!
Teasers:
Please, if you take anything, be so kind as to take note of the numbers of the icon(s) you're saving, since I am always experimenting with my styles and I would like to know what people like best. (This helps me so I can make more!) The numbers are above the icons.
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
011
012
013
014
015
016
017
018
019
020
021
022
023
024
025
026
027
028
029
030
031
032
033
034
035
036
037
038
039
040
041
042
043
044
045
046
047
048
049
050
051
052
053
054
055
056
057
058
059
060
061
062
063
064
065
066
no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 11:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-18 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:10 am (UTC)Thank you very much for letting me know!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-20 08:17 am (UTC)Actually quite the contrary! The majority of what you see here was made slowly bit-by-bit over a lengthy period of time (and my previous Cranford batch is actually quite old -- many months).
no subject
Date: 2010-07-21 09:34 am (UTC)Can I friend you? I'm a Christian and really have no one to talk to about religion, costume dramas ( basically anything that makes my heart & soul happy).
no subject
Date: 2010-07-22 06:14 am (UTC)Me too! ;-)
Sophie & Dr. Harrison, a very good Christian couple in my opinion.
Actually I disagree since both characters made a few remarks implying otherwise. ;-)
Can I friend you? I'm a Christian and really have no one to talk to about religion, costume dramas
You are more than welcome to friend me! And as for not having anyone to talk to, there are scores of communities here on LiveJournal dedicated to both topics!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-21 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-22 06:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-21 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-22 06:17 am (UTC)I would have made more of his character if I'd had any more promos left. ;-P
no subject
Date: 2010-08-02 06:39 pm (UTC)My favs: 14, 15, 18, 19, 28, 32, 40, 42, 47 (OMG, so creative!) and 60.
Great work!
no subject
Date: 2010-08-03 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-02 05:19 pm (UTC)