ext_233128 ([identity profile] midenianscholar.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] olde_fashioned 2007-07-02 11:20 pm (UTC)

But I felt like Batman never really...I don't know...defend the idea. I mean, he won and saved the city, but I felt like we didn't get a good, strong--reason, if that make sense. Just as an example, Spiderman uses secondary characters (Uncle Ben, etc.) and speeches, thoughts and all to present the moral of the story and repeat it and carry it through. In Batman it felt like the bad guy had an argument on multiple levels, but Batman only had one, that people deserve a chance, but he never really dug deeper than that, which left his argument feeling shallow. (In my opinion, of course. And I only saw it once.)

I've got nothing against gritty-ness, and I like things to be realistic, but I need pay off, and I analyze things a lot so...yeah.

:)


Well, I don't know for certain but it'd make sense.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting